tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4370064157012619302024-02-08T09:33:35.964-08:00The Reluctant Digital HistorianAmanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.comBlogger43125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-80581579938006720702015-05-08T10:38:00.000-07:002018-01-17T06:37:31.544-08:00Self EvaluationI am right in that in-between moment where the formal class meetings are over and my opportunity to assess the final projects has not quite come yet. I thought I would take a couple of minutes and review how the course went this second time through. The syllabus, should you want to check it out, is available <a href="https://panthers-my.sharepoint.com/:b:/g/personal/seligman_uwm_edu/EQq8bRK0WL5PthYJ5xIxYW8Bxnn57KK5tOGtok_yjLeCNA">here</a>.<br />
<br />
The "tools" presentations are far and away the most useful part of the course. They allow students to investigate an array of useful (and less useful) Big and Small digital tools that they can incorporate into their work right away. Collectively, they also teach the lesson that solutions are out there--or can be developed. I will keep this practice during the next iteration of the class.<br />
<br />
I was very glad to have changed the final project into a collectively-prepared grant application rather than individual assignments. The class presentations on Tuesday night were terrific and really showcased how much the students have synthesized over the semester. This feature stays.<br />
<br />
I was also pleased with how useful the readings were. I felt much better informed about the selections this second time through. I think that the order should be rejiggered next time through, however. The Big Data and Relational Databases weeks should definitely be flipped. Digital Archives and Full-Text Databases belong later, Twitter and Storify earlier. Related, I was disappointed that none of the students took to tweeting about the class. Almost all the Tweets with #<a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/his717s15?f=realtime" target="_blank">HIS717S15</a> are my own.<br />
<br />
One small change I have not yet been able to think through: when I assign students to make a change to Wikipedia, do I really need to <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Student_assignments" target="_blank">run it by the Wikipedians first</a> and set up a class page and sandbox? My theory is that I don't, for a couple of reasons. Students in this class are all graduate students; the assignment is minimal (make a change and watch what happens), no more than anyone might do on their own; I figured out this year to require that the change be "truthful," which helps to prevent vandalism. One of the most interesting points that came out of our discussion about this Wikipedia assignment was the way it caused the students to really review the site, as they looked for topics that needed fixing.<br />
<br />
Finally, the portion of the course that I again feel is least successful is the <a href="https://history717uwm.wordpress.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>. Although creating a dedicated blog site was an improvement over having each student maintain his or her own blog, the process was still not integrated into the class as a whole. In my wild pedagogical imagination, the students will keep up with their blog posts and responses and bring those conversations into the classroom. Although the students were fairly dutiful about posting, it did not feed back into the classroom in the way that I wished. More fodder for next time. And I hope there will be a next time (although not in 2015-2016).Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-86367331424213802692015-05-06T14:10:00.004-07:002015-05-06T14:10:49.447-07:00Week 14: Conclusion<span style="font-family: inherit;">Last night was the last class for History 717, Spring 2015 version. In addition to two terrific presentations from the students about their semester DH projects, we discussed the course as a whole. Here are our class notes on What We Learned This Semester:</span><br />
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-top: 0pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">What did we learn about digital history this semester?</span></span></div>
<b id="docs-internal-guid-13fb9735-2b0f-0d7a-18ad-c51b7a1a63ef" style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></b>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 36pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: -36pt;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Evaluating DH projects in terms of metadata, funding, and front and backmatter of the websites.</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Challenges DH faces in academia and public history</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Perishability of DH</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Emphasis on projects to market themselves: how do we build this into future curricula? What do you do about platforms being ephemeral?</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">problem of credit for tenure and promotion</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">How digital tools can expand your ability to work with historical documents, reconceive ways of working your topic--think outside the box</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">A lot of ways to be more organized and more efficient</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Presentations on different tools</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Learning a new tool doesn’t have to be scary</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Blogging can be used professionally, not just LiveJournal</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">How conservative/luddite/resistant are we?</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Potential for tools learned</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">Don’t have to be part of an institution to be part of a historical project (gold star)</span></span></div>
<b style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-family: inherit;"><br /></span></b>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 36pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: -36pt;">
<span style="background-color: transparent; color: black; font-size: 15px; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: none; vertical-align: baseline; white-space: pre-wrap;"><span style="font-family: inherit;">What do you wish you had learned?</span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr" style="line-height: 1.38; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 36pt; margin-top: 0pt; text-indent: -36pt;">
<span style="font-family: inherit;"><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;"> Closer connect DH with the public...how does it become public history</span><br /><span style="font-size: 15px; line-height: 1.38; text-indent: -36pt; white-space: pre-wrap;">How does a database work?</span></span></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-17982939306588394182015-04-27T08:10:00.006-07:002015-04-27T08:10:46.807-07:00Week 13: Evaluating Digital Scholarship<div class="MsoNormal">
Class session goal: develop our own list of criteria for
evaluating digital projects.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What criteria should we use to assess digital scholarship?
How do we know if a digital project is a success?</li>
<li>What kinds of problems do we need to take into consideration
when evaluating digital history projects? How are these problems different from
the problems associated with traditional history projects?</li>
<li>What is the context for most of the evaluations being
discussed here? Are they talking about critical reviews, such as you might
offer in a journal review of a website? Or are they talking about decisions
about people’s jobs? Do some (or all) of these criteria apply in both contexts?</li>
<li>To what extent can academic tenure and promotion advice be
translated to other contexts?</li>
<li>What criteria have we been using to evaluate websites? Based
on the advice in these articles, what else could we be examining that we have
not been talking about together?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Todd Pressner,
“<a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/how-to-evaluate-digitalscholarship-by-todd-presner/" target="_blank">How to Evaluate Digital Scholarship</a>,” <i>Journal
of Digital Humanities</i> 1(4) (2012).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why is it important to view a digital project in the medium
in which it was created?</li>
<li>“New knowledge is not just new content but also new ways of
organizing, classifying, and interacting with content.”</li>
<li>Are any criteria missing?</li>
<li>Do you find any of these criteria controversial?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Geoffrey
Rockwell, “<a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/short-guide-toevaluation-of-digital-work-by-geoffrey-rockwell/" target="_blank">Short Guide to Evaluation of Digital Work</a>,” <i>Journal of Digital Humanities</i> 1 (4) (2012).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What kinds of evaluations is he talking about?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
James Smithies,
“<a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-%204/evaluating-scholarly-digital-outputs-by-james-smithies/" target="_blank">Evaluating Scholarly Digital Outputs</a>: The Six Layers Approach,” <i>Journal of Digital Humanities</i> 1 (4)
(2012).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why would you want to pin a project into one of these
categories?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Laura Mandell, “<a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/promotion-andtenure-for-digital-scholarship-by-laura-mandell/" target="_blank">Promotion and Tenure forDigital Scholarship</a>,” <i>Journal of Digital
Humanities</i> 1 (4) (2012).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why did she write this document?</li>
<li>Why does she have to say explicitly that an article
published in a digital journal is no different than an article published in a
traditional print journal?</li>
<li>Do you agree that creating a platform for digital humanities
scholarship (such as Hypercities) should count as much as offering a new
interpretation?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Katherine D.
Harris, “<a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-%204/explaining-digital-humanities-in-promotion-documents-by-katherine-harris/" target="_blank">Explaining Digital Humanities in Promotion Documents</a>,” <i>Journal of Digital Humanities</i> 1 (4):
2012.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is a “legacy project”?</li>
<li>What does she mean by work that is ephemeral?</li>
<li>How can work that is ephemeral be integral to someone’s
scholarly productivity?</li>
<li>What range of activities does she include in her case?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
AHA, NCPH, OAH, “<a href="http://ncph.org/cms/wp-content/uploads/Engaged-Historian.pdf" target="_blank">Tenure, Promotion, and the Publicly Engaged Academic Historian</a>.” <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why do “publicly engaged academic” historians need their own
separate guidelines for tenure and promotion?</li>
<li>How is public history scholarship different from traditional
academic scholarship?</li>
<li>What is the thrust of the list of best practices? Are any
important considerations omitted?</li>
<li>What do they mean by “look beyond the traditional monograph”?</li>
<li>Why does this document give advice to departments and
administrators as well as to digital scholars?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
American
Historical Association, "<a href="http://historians.org/Documents/Teaching%20and%20Learning/Current%20Projects/Digital%20Scholarship%20Evaluation/Guidelines%20for%20the%20Professional%20Evaluation%20of%20Digital%20Scholarship%20in%20History.pdf" target="_blank">(Draft) Guidelines for the Professional Evaluation of Digital Scholarship in History</a>," April 2015, <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>“Scholarship is a documented and disciplined conversation
about matters of enduring consequence. Hiring, tenure, and promotion involve
peer-based judgments evaluating the significance of a scholar’s contribution to
one or more of those conversations.”</li>
<li>Why does this document give advice to departments as well as
to digital scholars?</li>
<li>Why is digital scholarship so often “unfinished”?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Cohen and Rosenzweig, <a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/preserving/" target="_blank">chapter 8</a> and “<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/finalthoughts/" target="_blank">Some Final Thoughts</a>”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>“The Ivar Aasen Centre of Language and Culture, a literary
museum in Norway, lost the ability to use its large, expensive electronic
catalog of holdings after the death of the one administrator who knew the two
sequential passwords into the system.”</li>
<li>Is it obvious that all digital history projects should be
preserved?</li>
<li>What is their general advice about how to choose the systems
for coding and storing your project?</li>
<li>Why isn’t backing up your project on paper a really good
idea?</li>
<li>What is “emulation” as a strategy for preserving digital
materials? What are its advantages and disadvantages?</li>
<li>How can you strike a balance between being careful and being
ponderously slow?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-55961938110235552652015-04-20T08:47:00.001-07:002015-04-20T08:47:19.823-07:00Week 12: Relational Databases (plus copyright)<div class="MsoNormal">
Ansley T. Erickson, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:7/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#7.1" target="_blank">Historical Research and the Problem ofCategories: Reflections on 10,000 Digital Note Cards,</a>” <i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i> <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is a relational database?</li>
<li>How do <i>you</i> keep
track of all your notes for a project? How <i>should</i>
you do this?</li>
<li>What was Erickson’s goal in using a relational database for
her dissertation?</li>
<li>How much reading of and thinking about documents should you
do in the archives? How much do you do later?</li>
<li>How did she take advantage of the possibilities of the database
in her research and writing process?</li>
<li>When in the process should you start writing?</li>
<li>Do you actually organize your writing through categories, or
through topics, or through narrative?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Gwendolyn Midlo
Hall, “Africa and Africans in the African Diaspora: The Uses of Relational
Databases,” <i>American Historical Review</i>
(February 2010): 136-150. <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What motivates this article? Why does whether women milled
rice during the Middle Passage matter?</li>
<li>How do you know what is in a database you are working with? “Thousands
of new Brazilian and Portuguese voyages have been added, correcting the
Anglo-focused distortion of TSTD1.”</li>
<li>What limitations do databases have?</li>
<li>What does she mean by “unquantifiable data”?</li>
<li>What cautions does she offer about databases? “to answer,
they can be rigid and inflexible, locking in outmoded research and questions
and not allowing for new ones. Databases are not a higher form of knowledge
that can somehow trump other kinds of research. Scholarship is not a zero-sum
game.”</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Cohen and Rosenzweig, chapter 7, “<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/copyright/index.php" target="_blank">Owning the Past</a>”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What do you need to know about copyright law? How much do
Cohen and Rosenzweig want you to worry about it?</li>
<li>Do course instructors still use course packets?</li>
<li>What stance toward copyright do you expect from digital
historians?</li>
<li>What are the costs associated with acquiring permission to
use published sources in a digital project?</li>
<li>“Good copyright citizens—cooperative residents of the
digital commons—don’t try to grab rights they don’t have.”</li>
<li>What is Creative Commons?</li>
<li>What is fair use?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-75167015270297202862015-04-13T15:19:00.005-07:002015-04-13T15:19:49.013-07:00Week 11: Big Data<div class="MsoNormal">
<i><a href="http://www.themacroscope.org/" target="_blank">The Historian's Macroscope</a></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is topic modeling? How do they do it?</li>
<li>What is network analysis? How do they do it?</li>
<li>Can you tell how much “live writing” they actually did for
this project? How does their writing in public approach compare to Moravec’s?</li>
<li>What is github?</li>
<li>Are you persuaded by their proposal that shifts in training
and standards are needed for historical education?</li>
<li>What kinds of historical questions can you ask with Big Data
that you can’t with more traditional textual analysis methods?</li>
<li>At what stage in the research process would you imagine
visualizing your primary sources with a tool like Voyant?</li>
<li>What do you think of this definition of Big Data?: “For us,
big data is simply more data that you could conceivably read yourself in a
reasonable amount of time – or, even more inclusively – information that
requires computational intervention to make new sense of it.”</li>
<li>Does this book motivate you to learn to code?</li>
<li>Assuming you had a research problem that you needed a tool
for…how would you find out what tools are available and which ones you might
need to code yourself?</li>
<li>What concerns of copyright underpinned Google’s digitization
of the five big libraries?</li>
<li>What kinds of historical questions do you think you can ask
with Big Data?</li>
<li>What did they do with the <i>Dictionary of Canadian Biography</i>?</li>
<li>What do they mean by “distant reading”? (PhD Comics example:
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp4y-_VoXdA">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp4y-_VoXdA</a>)</li>
<li>Differences among “information visualization,” “scientific
visualization,” and “infographic”</li>
<li>Let’s compare the 3 kinds of written in public approaches
that we have looked at so far this semester. What are their strengths and
weaknesses?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Cohen and Rosenzweig, chapter 6, <a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/collecting/">Collecting History Online</a><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>How are the challenges of digital archiving different now
than they were when Cohen and Rosenzweig wrote this chapter a decade ago?</li>
<li>How do you know that you have a target project audience that
is just the right size—not too narrow and not too broad?</li>
<li>How do you feel the blog is working for our class?</li>
<li>Do any of you run personal blogs? Why? Are they thematic in
any way?</li>
<li>What lessons do you take from the story of the Sept. 11
Digital Archive?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-49245690208083585962015-04-06T05:07:00.001-07:002015-04-07T08:14:50.052-07:00Week 10: Writing in Public<div class="MsoNormal">
This week's topic is "Writing in Public," a topic I did not include in the first iteration of History 717. I thought to include it this year only after reading Twitter accounts of the 2015 AHA meeting, which included a session on Writing in Public. <a href="http://michellemoravec.com/" target="_blank">Michele Moravec</a> (Rosemont College) shares her work-in-progress online for readers to engage as she writes.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
General questions:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
What are the reasons for writing in public?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Would you do it?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Should you advertise it if you do?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Touch on dissertation/thesis embargo question.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Michele Moravec, <a href="http://politicsofwomensculture.michellemoravec.com/uncategorized/1131/" target="_blank">#writinginpublic</a></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>How do you pick a platform for writing in public?</li>
<li>Why does Moravec write in public? What are other reasons for
writing in public? Would you?</li>
<li>What are the risks of writing in public?</li>
<li>Is writing in public the same as “live writing”?</li>
<li>Would you do either?</li>
<li>How do you interact with yourself while you write?</li>
<li>How does writing in public work as a form of peer review?</li>
<li>What kind of “behind the scenes” writing activity might support
a written in public project like this? For example, how does the organization
emerge? How does revising work? What if the author needs to move things around?
How far along in a project do you need to be before you start “writing it in
public?” What are the implications of writing in two platforms, using different
word processing tools? How would you manage keeping track of two organizational
systems? How would you decide what to post in public and what to do in private?
How would you leave notes for yourself about what still needed to be done, what
you were confused by?</li>
<li>How could you use different platforms differently?</li>
<li>I’m intrigued by the idea of live commenting. When I am a
peer reviewer in a traditional process, the author doesn’t get my comments as I
go along. I suppose I could go back and insert them later, but I am too lazy to
refigure where they all should go!</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Michele Moravec, <a href="http://politicsofwomensculture.michellemoravec.com/" target="_blank">Politics of Women's Culture </a>manuscript:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>[Note that I end up with almost no substantive questions
about this work, probably because it is so far afield for me. I can’t tell what
might be known from previous scholarship and what is really new here, since I
just am not immersed in that literature]</li>
<li>How did you decide how to navigate through the book?</li>
<li>Did you read the comments as you went along?</li>
<li>If an author puts up images in a work in progress written in
public, does she have to get permissions for them the same way she would with a
“published” work?</li>
<li>What argument could you get from the work in progress?
Perhaps start with small groups to see what they think the argument is. Perhaps
like trying to identify the elephant with a blindfold on?</li>
<li>What is this project about?</li>
<li>Do you feel like you need to read the finished book?</li>
<li>How would you handle footnoting if writing in public? How
would footnoting integrate with the use of a program like Zotero or RefWorks
that handled many of the fine details for you?</li>
<li>I wonder why comments are closed on the section on <i>The Journal of Women’s History</i>. I wanted
to ask of paragraph 6 whether there are archives that would show the process by
which authors decided what to do with their pieces and what to respond to. I’m
sure I am only thinking of this because of reading in the open peer review
format of this manuscript.</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Cohen and Rosenzweig chapter 5, “<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/audience/" target="_blank">Building an Audience</a>”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Do you respond to the idea of marketing in the negative way
that Cohen and Rosenzweig assume?</li>
<li>Should writing in public be regarded as a form of marketing
by building an audience?</li>
<li>How might you build an audience for the group projects you
are working on?</li>
<li>How does Google work, according to Cohen and Rosenzweig?</li>
<li>What is the difference between “hits” and “visitors” and “users”?</li>
<li>What are some reliable ways of figuring out why users come
to your site?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-72554302202053352042015-03-30T08:40:00.001-07:002015-03-30T08:40:27.066-07:00Week 9: Peer Review<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>How is open peer review different from traditional blind
peer review, and what are the implications for academic publishing?</li>
<li>How do digital media present credit problems for authors who
are pursuing tenure?</li>
<li>How can academic communities handle credit for collaborative
work?</li>
<li>What implications do these articles have for the way you are
receiving credit for your group projects in this class?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Sheila Cavanagh, “<a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/living-in-a-digital-world-by-sheila-cavanagh/" target="_blank">Living in a Digital World: Rethinking Peer Review, Collaboration, and Open Access</a>,” <i>Journal of Digital Humanities </i>1 (4).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>How do digital media complicate traditional scholarly peer
review?</li>
<li>Why would digital contributions be difficult for traditional
academic departments to assess? To include in tenure and promotion reviews?</li>
<li>Who are the peers who can review digital projects? What
standards do they and should they apply? Are those the same criteria that
department scholarly evaluations use?</li>
<li>Why is this true (or not)?: ‘“Self-publishing” on the web,
for instance, does not correspond to traditional print “self-publishing” as
closely as many non-digitally savvy faculty members believe.’</li>
<li>What are the problems of traditional peer review for digital
projects?</li>
<li>How should graduate training adapt to the digital age?</li>
<li>Why are humanities scholars reluctant to see collaboration
as worthy of credit?</li>
<li>Why do humanities scholars need institutional support for
digital projects?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Bethany Nowviske, “<a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/evaluating-collaborative-digital-scholarship-by-bethany-nowviskie/" target="_blank">Evaluating Collaborative DigitalScholarship (Or, Where Credit is Due)</a>,” <i>Journal of Digital Humanities </i>1 (4).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why does she argue that Tenure and Promotion committees are
not really qualified to assess collaborative scholarship?</li>
<li>What does this mean?: “the activity I want to argue is
actually <i>the new responsibility</i> of tenure and promotion
committees. This is your responsibility to assess quality in digital humanities
work — <i>not</i> in terms of product or output — but as embodied in
an evolving and continuous series of transformative <i>processes</i>.”</li>
<li>Why is so much of this essay about human relationships?</li>
<li>What should we do about the problem of digital projects
never being done?</li>
<li>Is this just a lot of hand-wringing over problems that
scientists and museums (and other public historians) have long-since solved?</li>
<li>“Digital humanities practitioners don’t often say, but we <i>all
know</i> that collaborative work involves a kind of <i>perpetual peer
review</i>.”</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Kristen Nawrotski and Jack Dougherty, “Introduction,” in
<i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is different about this approach to peer review?</li>
<li>Take a look at some of the original comments: <a href="http://writinghistory.trincoll.edu/">http://writinghistory.trincoll.edu/</a></li>
<li>It might be hard to tell, since we have been reading this
volume across multiple weeks: but did their review process produce a “better
book”?</li>
<li>What skills do you need to participate in (or run!) an open
peer-review project such as this one?</li>
<li>How does the timing problem affect participation in a
project like this one?</li>
<li>“As a result, higher education pays twice for scholarship
produced by its own faculty: first, in the form of salary or sabbatical support
for individual professors, and second, in fees for the right to distribute the
work.”</li>
<li>Should blogs count?</li>
<li>Why doesn’t the <i>Writing
History in the Digital Age</i> book have a comment section on the published
version?</li>
<li>What do they mean by “filter then publish” and “publish then
filter”?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Jack Dougherty, Kristen Nawrotzki, Charlotte D. Rochez, and
Timothy Burke, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:10/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#10.3" target="_blank">Conclusions: What We Learned from Writing History in theDigital Age</a>,” in <i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Can you think of any other project in which peer reviewers
have become co-authors?</li>
<li>Does this conclusion—the result of the open peer review
process—hang together effectively as an essay?</li>
<li>“But the most important lesson we learned was the power of a
critical mass of contributors with their own social media connections. When we
tweeted or blogged about new essay ideas on our edited volume, this information
cascaded as several authors and commenters recirculated it on their Twitter,
Facebook, and WordPress accounts.”</li>
<li>Were you interested in the comments made on the book in
progress? Did anyone go back and look at them?</li>
<li>Would you publish an essay in progress on the internet?</li>
<li>“In this way, the volume blurred the boundaries between a
conference and a book.”</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Jack Dougherty, “<a href="http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/question/what-are-new-insights-digital-publishing/response/lessons-learned-open-peer-review-digital-" target="_blank">Lessons Learned from Open Peer Review for Digital Book Publishing</a>,” <i>media commons: a digital scholarly network</i>, October
29, 2013<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What are the risks to publishers if they have an open peer
review project? What are the reasons they might be inclined or disinclined to
pursue such a project?</li>
<li>What are the risks to authors? Why might they be inclined or
disinclined to participate in an open peer review project?</li>
<li>What difference does/should it make to authors in
multi-paper projects to see the other essays as they develop?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-12945411842097272362015-03-22T06:13:00.002-07:002015-03-22T06:13:40.189-07:00Week 8: WikipediaIn the spirit of my article "Teaching Wikipedia without Apologies," I devote an entire week of this seminar (and a blog assignment) to Wikipedia.<br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
General:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Let’s develop a list of things that people who use <a href="http://www.wikipedia.org/" target="_blank">Wikipedia</a>should understand about it.</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Roy Rosenzweig, “Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and
the Future of the Past,” <i>Journal of
American History</i> 93, no. 1 (2006): 141-46.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What factors limit historians’ willingness to contribute to
Wikipedia?</li>
<li>Ten years down the road, which of Rosenzweig’s observations about
Wikipedia are still useful and valid?</li>
<li>What does this line suggest about Wikipedia’s orientation?: “whom
Wales knew from their joint participation in online mailing lists and Usenet
discussion groups devoted to Ayn Rand and objectivism”</li>
<li>What do you think of the Wikipedia’s review process?
Compared to traditional academic peer review, what advantages and disadvantages
does it offer?</li>
<li>Is it true that encyclopedias do not break new ground
intellectually?</li>
<li>What does <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view" target="_blank">NPOV </a>mean? What are its implications for writing
content for Wikipedia?</li>
<li>Who contributes to Wikipedia?</li>
<li>What is the right word for people who do stuff on Wikipedia?
Writers, editors, contributors, Wikipedians?</li>
<li>What makes for good historical writing? Do you agree that
writing is better in professional historical sources than on Wikipedia? Why?</li>
<li>What precautions should you take before assuming the
credibility of any given entry in Wikipedia?</li>
<li>Should we encourage or discourage students from using
Wikipedia?</li>
<li>What do you think of Rosenzweig’s criticism about good
academic sources being locked behind paywalls?</li>
<li>Do you agree that Wikipedia’s Discussion pages amount to
historiographic debate?</li>
<li>Do you agree that historians should contribute to Wikipedia?
Would you contribute on a regular basis? How would you feel about having your “contributions”
changed?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
"<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schools_and_universities_project" target="_blank">Wikipedia: School and University Projects</a>"<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Given the very small scale of the assignment for this class,
do you think I should have observed Wikipedia’s rules for class projects more
closely?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Shawn Graham, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:5/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#5.3" target="_blank">The Wikiblitz: A Wikipedia Editing Assignmentin a First-Year Undergraduate Class</a>,” <i>Writing
History in the Digital Age</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>“Digital media make all history public history (whether we
like it or not),<a href="https://www.blogger.com/null" name="N4e"></a><a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:5/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#N4e">[4]</a> and we need to get our research into that
positive feedback loop.”</li>
<li>‘Understanding how the code forces a particular worldview on
the user is a key portion of becoming a “digital historian.”’ How much about
coding do you think you need to know? How does coding affect our experience of
reading a text or site?</li>
<li>How does the necessity of “monitoring” changes you make to
Wikipedia affect your inclination to be a contributor?</li>
<li>“<i>Wikipedia</i> is not just the content of a given
page but also the network structure of links that connect pages together.”</li>
<li>What is the role of “bots” in running Wikipedia?</li>
<li>Why do you think the history majors resisted participating in
this class exercise by staying out sick?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Timothy Messer-Kruse, “<a href="http://chronicle.com/article/TheUndue-Weight-of-Truth-on/130704/" target="_blank">The ‘Undue Weight’ of Truth onWikipedia</a>,” <i>The Chronicle of Higher Education</i> online, February 12, 2012, <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why doesn’t expertise matter on Wikipedia?</li>
<li>Why does a “majority” determine what gets included on
Wikipedia?</li>
<li>What does the existence (and persistence) of “Wiki-gatekeepers”
suggest about the general claim that “just anyone” can edit Wikipedia?</li>
<li>“"Wikipedia is not 'truth,' Wikipedia is
'verifiability' of reliable sources. Hence, if most secondary sources which are
taken as reliable happen to repeat a flawed account or description of
something, Wikipedia will echo that."”</li>
<li>Looking at<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haymarket_affair" target="_blank"> the entry</a> on "the Haymarket affair" now, it looks to me like Messer-Kruse’s
changes got through.</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Martha Saxton, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:5/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#5.4" target="_blank">Wikipedia and Women’s History: A ClassroomExperience</a>,” <i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why aren’t primary source citations “verifiable”?</li>
<li>What kind of resistance to incorporating women’s history
into Wikipedia did Martha Saxton’s students encounter?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Amanda Seligman, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:6/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#6.3" target="_blank">Teaching Wikipedia without Apologies</a>,”
<i>Writing History in the Digital Age </i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What attitudes about encyclopedias in general, and Wikipedia
in particular, have you encountered in your classes?</li>
<li>Do you use reference works in your own research?</li>
<li>Could you detect arguments in the Wikipedia entries that you
looked at for this week’s discussion?</li>
<li>How did you learn about the existence of argument in
secondary historical sources? At this point in your education, do you feel
comfortable identifying them?</li>
<li>[Back up and discuss the process of developing the <i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i>
project.]</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Siobhan Senier, “<a href="http://epress.trincoll.edu/webwriting/chapter/senier/" target="_blank">Indigenizing Wikipedia: StudentAccountability to Native American Authors on the World’s Largest Encyclopedia</a>,”
<i>Web Writing: Why & How for Liberal Arts Teaching & Learning</i> <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What counts as “notable” according to Wikipedia standards?</li>
<li>[Discuss the differences between the <i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i> and the <i>Web Writing</i> process and formats]</li>
<li>Does Wikipedia merit the sustained and organized efforts to
improve it, such as those organized by feminist scholars?</li>
<li>‘But “reliability,” of course, is slippery: even in the
academic realm, telling our students that university presses are “better” than
“the Internet” isn’t teaching them critical thinking.’</li>
<li>Should professors grade students’ Wikipedia contributions?
How?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Robert S. Wolff, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:5/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#5.2" target="_blank">The Historian’s Craft, Popular Memory, andWikipedia</a>,”<i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i> </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What does Wolff show us about Wikipedia as a site of popular
memory?</li>
<li>What is Wolff’s research method?</li>
<li>“More than just an encyclopedia, <i>Wikipedia</i> serves
as a people’s museum of knowledge, a living repository of all that matters,
where the exhibits are written by ordinary folk, with nary an academic
historian in sight.”</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-5268236046184839832015-03-09T04:13:00.000-07:002015-03-09T04:13:15.609-07:00Week 7: #Twitterstorians<div class="MsoNormal">
Discuss experience of trying to understand the AHA through
Twitter<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
How could you use Twitter for your future historical work
(broadly considered)? Will you?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Leah Wright, “<a href="http://epress.trincoll.edu/webwriting/chapter/wright/">Tweet Me a Story</a>,”
in <i>Web Writing: Why & How for Liberal
Arts Teaching & Learning<o:p></o:p></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is Wright trying to teach her journalism students to
do? Which of these skills apply to historical writing?</li>
<li>Is brevity a virtue or a vice for historians?</li>
<li>Did the student Tweeters tweet similarly to or differently
from the scholars in the “Embedded Backchannel” article?</li>
<li>What role does Twitter have in news reporting now?</li>
<li>Why would you want to use Storify to compile tweets?</li>
<li>How could you use Twitter and Storify to engage students in
an undergraduate history class? In a museum exhibit? In a digital history
project?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
C. Ross, M. Terras, C. Warwick, and A. Welsh, “Enabled
Backchannel: Conference Twitter Use by Digital Humanists,” <i>Journal of Documentation</i>, 67(2) (2011): 214-237.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What did Ross et al. try to investigate about scholars’ use
of Twitter for conferences?</li>
<li>What did they find?</li>
<li>What methodological problems did they encounter?</li>
<li>Is Tweeting in public fora such as conferences disruptive or
fragmenting?</li>
<li>How do the peculiarities of Twitter make formal analysis
difficult?</li>
<li>Page 219: “Tweets were divided into seven categories:
comments on presentations; sharing resources; discussions and conversations;
jotting down notes; establishing an online presence; and asking organizational
questions.”</li>
<li>Page 221: “the presence of the @ sign signifies that the
Tweet is part of a conversation.”</li>
<li>Page 221: “This lends support to the notion of a “90:9:1”
rule (Nielson, 2006) for new social media, where 90 per cent of users are
lurkers, 9 per cent of users contribute from time to time and 1 per cent
participate a lot and account for the majority of contributions.”</li>
<li>Why would non-attendees use a conference hashtag?</li>
<li>Page 224: ‘Twitter challenges the traditional authorial
boundaries that are associated with writing and the word “text”.’</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
#aha2105<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Frustrated that non-historian groups are using the same
hashtag? Try using advanced search to limit by date around the early January
2015 time of the AHA meeting.</li>
<li>Is there a way around reading the conference backwards in
time?</li>
<li>To what uses do you see Twitter users putting the hashtag?</li>
<li>If you were going to use these tweets to write an essay
about the meeting, how would you go about tackling the problem of reading and
managing your notes?</li>
<li>Why do I go into skimming mode when reading Twitter instead
of careful reading?</li>
<li>How do historians use Storify to communicate about #aha2015?</li>
<li>Should/Would you embargo your thesis or dissertation?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-61081491952047128312015-03-01T04:51:00.001-08:002015-03-01T04:51:54.001-08:00Week 6<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p>An expected highlight of this week's class is that our two student project groups will be turning in their proposals for their final projects: a grant proposal.</o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p><br /></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
General questions </div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is Web 2.0?</li>
<li>What is “Shared Authority”?
Where do you come down on question of the role of experts and
non-experts in presenting the past?</li>
<li>Why would a member of the public participate in a shared
authority digital project when they could just start their own blog or put up a
website?</li>
<li>What is the role of museum staff in the world of public
curation of content?</li>
<li>Why is it important to this book that the editors see a
continuity between participation in the 20<sup>th</sup> century physical spaces
and the 21<sup>st</sup> century virtual spaces?</li>
<li>Is “Humans of New York” an example of Letting Go?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Nina Simon, “Participatory Design and the Future of Museums”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is a “folksonomy”?</li>
<li>What kind of participatory techniques have you found
engaging on the web?</li>
<li>Do you agree that feedback has to get used?</li>
<li>What is the relationship between participatory feedback and
the “trending” feature of sites like Facebook and Twitter?</li>
<li>Do you want to go to museums where visitors create the
content? (I did at this one: <a href="http://cmany.org/">http://cmany.org/</a>)</li>
<li>What is the difference between the Unsuggester and spam?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Steve Zeitlin, “Where Are the Best Stories? Where Is My
Story?”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is the distinction between contributed stories and
curated stories?</li>
<li>Is Facebook a museum?</li>
<li>If they are curating the content of cityofmemory.org, in
what senses are they “letting go”?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br />
Matthew Fisher and Bill Adair, “Online Dialogue and Cultural Practice: A
Conversation”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What are the underlying reasons for Shared Authority?</li>
<li>Digital engagement tools: Favoriting, Tagging, Commenting,
Blogging</li>
<li>Is history just “a collection of truths”? What is the role
of analysis in public engagement?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Matthew MacArthur, “Get Real! The Role of Objects in the
Digital Age”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>I wonder what the role of 3-D printing might be in the
curation of digital objects.</li>
<li>Do you think that the physical experience or the digital
experience of museums is more important?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Kelly, <i>Teaching
History in the Digital Age</i>, <a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12146032.0001.001/1:9/--teaching-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1" target="_blank">chapter 5</a><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Should historians be responsible for getting digital content
online?</li>
<li>What do you think of representing history with “thought
experiments”? What is the goal of teaching history?</li>
<li>What is “backwards design”?</li>
<li>What do you think of Kelly’s Lying About the Past
experimental course?</li>
<li>Is it OK to ask students to put false information into <i>Wikipedia</i>? Into the Internet?</li>
<li>Why does Kelly narrate the hoax in the present tense as if
he was going to teach the course again?</li>
<li>Could Kelly have generated similar enthusiasm among his
students if he had found a well-documented but obscure historical figure for
them to research and document? That is, what is the role of “hoaxing” in this
class?</li>
<li>What was the educational value in Kelly’s experiment?</li>
<li>What is the point of teaching students to write papers?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Kelly,<i> Teaching
History in the Digital Age</i>, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12146032.0001.001/1:10/--teaching-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1" target="_blank">Conclusion</a>”<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Do you agree with Kelly’s underlying belief that young
people (=students) prefer to represent their learning about history in a variety
of non-written formats?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p>Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-39457359120688914102015-02-23T09:18:00.000-08:002015-02-23T09:22:53.518-08:00Week 5: Digital Archives and Full-Text Databases<div class="MsoNormal">
General questions for consideration:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is a database? In what ways is a full-text database
parallel to an archive? In what ways is it different?</li>
<li>Are we talking about data or evidence or something else?</li>
<li>Generate list of questions you automatically ask yourself
when picking up a book or looking at an archival collection. What is a
comparable list for using a full-text database for research?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Kathryn Kish Sklar and Thomas Dublin, “<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12230987.0001.001/1:7/--writing-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1#7.2" target="_blank">Creating Meaning in a Sea of Information: The Women and Social Movements Web Site</a>,”
in <i>Writing History in the Digital Age</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What do they mean by “document project”? What is involved in
producing one? How is it different from the kinds of research projects that
historians usually conduct?</li>
<li>In what sense is it a database? In what sense is their site a journal?</li>
<li>Why did they join a contract with Alexander Street Press?
What are the advantages and disadvantages of such a commercial arrangement?
What provisions have they made against ASP’s disappearance?</li>
<li>Why do they combine primary sources and interpretive texts?</li>
<li>What form do the primary sources take in their database? Why
don’t the documents appear in their original form?</li>
<li>What advantages are there to having so many primary sources
digitized on a single site?</li>
<li>How did this project come to take on preservation as a
mission?</li>
<li>Is this project a realization of the “recombinant documents”
that Mills Kelly wrote about?</li>
<li>What happens to your interpretation of a document when it is
extracted from its archival context?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
(D2L) Nancy Chaffin Hunter, Kathleen Legg, and Beth
Oehlerts, “Two Librarians, an Archivist, and 13,000 Images: Collaborating to
Build a Digital Collection,” <i>Library Quarterly</i> 80(1) (2010): 81-109.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is the<a href="http://lib.colostate.edu/archives/uhpc/" target="_blank"> University Historic Photograph Collection at Colorado State University</a>?</li>
<li>Who created it, and how?</li>
<li>In what ways is digital browse
better than file-cabinet browse? Are there disadvantages?</li>
<li>Can you make sense of the work
flow visualization?</li>
<li>What do you learn about librarians
and archivists from this article?</li>
<li>How does a library-science
literature review differ from a historiography?</li>
<li>What is a <a href="http://www2.kent.edu/slis/programs/mlis/cataloging-or-metadata.cfm" target="_blank">metadata librarian</a>?</li>
<li>Would you consider this project a
digital history project? Why or why not?</li>
<li>In what sense is it a database? In
what sense is it interpretive?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Charles Upchurch, “Full-Text Databases
and Historical Research: Cautionary Results from a Ten-Year Study,” <i>Journal of Social History</i> 46 (1) (Fall
2012): 89-105.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What are the advantages of
full-text databases? What are the disadvantages?</li>
<li>What do you need to know about the
databases you are working with before you start to seriously analyze your data?
Develop a list of questions. How would you find answers to these questions? How
useful did Upchurch find it to ask the database publishers?</li>
<li>What do you learn from this
article about how OCR works? What is “article zoning”? What is “fuzzy searching”?</li>
<li>What does this article teach us
about research design?</li>
<li>What does it teach us about how to
keep track of our own research processes?</li>
<li>What do you learn about use of
keyword search from this article?</li>
<li>Under what kinds of research plans
would you want to keep track of all the searches you conducted? What would be a
good method for keeping track?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Cohen and Rosenzweig, chapter 3-4<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Chapter 3, “<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/digitizing/" target="_blank">Becoming Digital</a>”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>How do you know that it is worth it
to conduct a digitization project? Should we just be digitizing everything? How
can we set priorities?</li>
<li>What losses should you be
cognizant of when you think about digitized sources?</li>
<li>What are the possible options for
digitizing text that they describe?</li>
<li>How did the authors of the other
articles we read for today go about answering the kinds of questions Cohen and
Rosenzweig raise about what is worth doing and what is not worth doing?</li>
<li>Do you think it is better for
scholars to annotate (mark up) documents for other people to use, or to work
with full-text search? Are there reasons you might choose one rather than the
other for one project, and then use the other for another project?</li>
<li>Laying OCR underneath a scanned
image.</li>
<li>Why is typing sometimes better? I
wonder if this is still true now that a decade has elapsed since this book’s publication.</li>
<li>When thinking about digitizing
images, audio, or video, what qualities do you need to consider that you would
not bother with for text?</li>
<li>What considerations should you
keep in mind about whether to contract out the digitization?</li>
<li>If you “do the work yourself” is
it really free? How could you account for the cost of doing it yourself?</li>
<li>How should you find out what
standards to use now?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Chapter 4, “<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/designing/">Designing for the History
Web</a>”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What elements of website design do
you consider essential?</li>
<li>How important is visual appeal for
the project your group is developing?</li>
<li>To what extent is it important to
make design choices for your grant application project?</li>
<li>Will you chose a URL?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-13086420583176014182015-02-16T06:50:00.003-08:002015-02-16T06:50:34.437-08:00Week 4: There is a lot of information out there for historians to work with<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -31.5pt;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Roy Rosenzweig, “Scarcity or Abundance: Preserving the Past
in a Digital Era.” American Historical Review 108 (3) (2003): 735-762.</div>
<ul>
<li>What digital aspects of your life alone disappear?</li>
<li>What are the difficulties of preserving digital primary
sources?</li>
<li>How do you know when you have done enough research? Have you
ever faced a situation where you thought you had found and examined all the
relevant primary sources?</li>
<li>Rosenzweig argues that we face a future task of writing
history in a world in which there are too many records for us to cope with,
disappearing evidence, and a broadened audience.</li>
<li>Are these technical problems, or should we historians truly
be concerned?</li>
<li>Why are digital documents vulnerable?</li>
<li>Blurring and merging of professional responsibilities.
Historians, archives, and museums. Who should be responsible for keeping the
machines needed to read old digital primary sources?</li>
<li>Is it important to read (or at least store) digital primary
sources in their original format, or would physical copies suffice?</li>
<li>How do copyright and ownership issues enter the picture of
preserving digital sources?</li>
<li>Why have historians been ignoring the problems of preserving
digital sources?</li>
<li>What are the advantages and disadvantages of letting
commercial enterprises have control of archiving?</li>
<li>How might the challenges outlined in this article shape the
kind of historical writing that we will see over the next decades?</li>
</ul>
<br />David Armitage and Jo Guldi, <i>The History Manifesto</i>, <a href="http://historymanifesto.cambridge.org/read/chapter-4-big-questions-big-data/" target="_blank">chapter 4</a>: <br /><ul>
<li>Did you read this online or download it? What is Open
Access?</li>
<li>What can you infer from the website hosting <i>The History Manifesto </i>about the authors’
goals and relationship to digital history? How successful do they seem at
achieving those goals, based on their site? What opportunities for interacting
with <i>The History Manifesto</i> do they
make available?</li>
<li>How does it affect your reading experience to have the
outline of the book always available in the left hand margin of the screen? How
about the footnote functionality? What was your experience of “turning pages”
and “turning sections”? Why isn’t there a “next section” button at the bottom
of the page?</li>
<li>What do they mean by “machine-read”? Should we think of this
activity as reading?</li>
<li>How do their inquiries fit particularly with their other
scholarly focus on the <i>longue durée</i>?</li>
<li>What kinds of unfamiliar historical research approaches do
they discuss? Can you imagine yourself needing to use any of them? Wanting to?</li>
<li>What is <a href="http://papermachines.org/" target="_blank">Paper Machines</a>?</li>
<li>Panama Zotero group: again the blurring of historians,
archivists, and librarians.</li>
<li>What is involved in visualizing text-based “data”? Is the
visualization enough?</li>
<li>What does this sentence mean?: “Traditional research,
limited by the sheer breadth of the non- digitised archive and the time
necessary to sort through it, becomes easily shackled to histories of
institutions and actors in power, for instance characterising universal trends
in the American empire from the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations’ investments
in pesticides, as some historians have done.”</li>
<li>Examples of the “untapped sources of historical data”? Are
those sources digitally available? How much work is involved in digitizing them
so that historians can work with them in the ways Guldi and Armitage envision?</li>
<li>How are we ever going to keep track of this hyperabundance
of information—and scholarly discussions of it—so that we can know what to go
look at? How would you know to go looking for the Declassification Engine, for
example? How can you prevent yourself from going out and laboriously
duplicating someone else’s tech work?</li>
<li>“This enterprise points to the hunger in the private sector
for experts who understand time – on either the short <i>durée</i> or
the long.”</li>
<li>Does this chapter represent a demonstrated claim or an
extended assertion (or polemic)?</li>
<li>“In a world of mobility, the university’s long sense of
historical traditions substitute for the long-term thinking that was the
preserve of shamans, priests, and elders in another community.”</li>
<li>What special skills do historians bring to the discussion of
big data? “The reading of temporally generated sequences of heterogeneous data
is a historian’s speciality.”</li>
<li>If you “read” big data broadly, can you still know something
deeply?</li>
<li>Are you persuaded by this: “Their training should
evolve to entertain conversations about what makes a good <i>longue durée</i> narrative,
about how the archival skills of the micro-historian can be combined with the
overarching suggestions offered by the macroscope. In the era of<i>longue-durée</i> tools,
when experimenting across centuries becomes part of the toolkit of every
graduate student, conversations about the appropriate audience and application
of large-scale examinations of history may become part of the fabric of every
History department.”</li>
<li>Do you see yourself in this?: “Historians may become
tool-builders and tool-reviewers as well as tool-consumers and tool-teachers.”</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-30756078063893831752015-02-14T15:23:00.000-08:002015-02-14T15:23:15.350-08:00Prepping for classOne of my unsolved problems as an instructor of digital history is managing the readings that I assign. Not, of course (!) in the sense of getting the reading done. But because I have assigned almost all digital materials, I am doing my reading on the computer. Which, in this case, is the laptop I work with at home. I have not figured out how I as the instructor should manage the readings when we talk about them in class. I do make a practice of pulling them up on the class computer and monitor so that we can all turn to the same "page" if necessary. But I can't idly and subtly look through an article for a particular passage without making it patently obvious to the students that I am not attending wholly to what they are saying. I could possibly have the readings on a second laptop in class, but then I as an instructor will be sitting behind a wall of screens, dividing myself from my class.<br />
<br />
I wonder how other professors deal with this problem.Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-79823886460979511052015-02-09T08:29:00.000-08:002015-02-09T08:29:08.829-08:00Week 3<div class="MsoNormal">
This is a key week in the class: we will divide into groups to work on semester-long projects. I have never put students into long-term groups before, so I am a little apprehensive about how to do it. Right now my intent is to let some (controlled) chaos reign and see if the students sort themselves into groups without help. If they need help, my plan is to have them engage in "speed dating," each talking to everyone else in the class for a fixed amount of time (e.g. two minutes) to test whether they will get along well enough to work together. Following the speed-rounds, students could submit to me a list of people they want to work with, and I could take a couple of minutes to organize the groups on that basis.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
No one signed up to give a presentation this week, which might be just as well given the need to break into groups. Depending on how long it takes to organize into groups, I intend to take the students on a guided tour of the <i>E<a href="http://emke.uwm.edu/" target="_blank">ncyclopedia of Milwaukee</a>'s</i> successful grant application to the <a href="http://www.neh.gov/" target="_blank">National Endowment for the Humanities</a>.</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Reading questions: <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
Kelly, <i>Teaching History in the Digital Age</i><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12146032.0001.001/1:7/--teaching-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1" target="_blank">Chapter 3 </a><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<span style="text-indent: -0.25in;"> </span><br /><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">What does he
mean about books “reading each other”?</span><br /><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">What does he
mean by “recombinant documents”? Why might you want such things?</span><br /><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">What kind of
metadata do you take in about primary sources, almost unconsciously, when you
start to work with them in traditional formats? How do you get this metadata from
digital sources?</span><br /><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">What kind of
new questions are made possibly by the availability and searchability of
digital primary sources? How would this availability change your plans for your
own research projects? Would you still travel to archives to conduct research?</span><br /><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">What is “text
mining”? Why would you want to do this? Given the amount of information produced,
how would you make sense of it? Is close reading obsolete?</span><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12146032.0001.001/1:8/--teaching-history-in-the-digital-age?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1" target="_blank">Chapter 4</a><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
What history-writing
skills do you think that you (and students) need in the 21<sup>st</sup>
century? Does the standard college essay format teach you those skills?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
How do you feel
about requiring students to write in public instead of just handing in their
work to the professor to read? How should we take into consideration student
privacy issues when putting their work in the public realm?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
What do you
think about the comparison to basketball: that we teach basketball by having
students handle the ball from the outset; and we should have students “make”
history right from the outset as well?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
Are you
familiar with the idea of the <a href="http://dublincore.org/">Dublin Core</a>
standards?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
What do you
think about designing (undergraduate) courses around skills and understanding
rather than around content?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; tab-stops: 175.5pt; text-indent: -.25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
Cohen and
Rosenzweig, chapters 1-2<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/starting/1.php" target="_blank">Chapter 1</a>:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
19: why wouldn’t
a history website be accepted as “academic
venture”?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
22: how Yahoo’s
organization (“librarian’s touch of classification”) helped; how is history
presently organized/accessible on the internet? <o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
What does he
mean by “deep web”? Why don’t searches pull up materials behind paywalls? What
would you do if they did?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
25: list of 5
main types of history websites: archives, secondary sources, teaching, discussion,
organizational. Have these five categories blurred more or separated more since
this book was published in 2005?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
29: it is easy
to see why amateur enthusiasts don’t care about provenance of primary
documents. But why does provenance matter to scholars?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
Why isn’t there
a convention to italicize (or put in quotation marks) the titles of websites in
use in this book?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
Do you think
blogs have successfully challenged the journal article?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
44: why have
libraries and archives taken to the web to expand their mission to teaching?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
50: Is their
charge to become familiar with how history is done on the web before getting
started with your own project still realistic?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in; text-indent: -.25in;">
<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/starting/" target="_blank">Chapter 2</a>:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
53: example of
20,000 documents stored in a database and displayed on the web only when called
up. Why is this a sound strategy for presenting information digitally? What
does it imply about how the contents have to be organized and stored?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Do you need to
know HTML to do digital history? What do you need to know <i>about</i> HTML?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Do you agree that
HTML is basically readable?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
How do you look
at the source code for a web page, as they recommend?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
What kind of
planning process for your digital project do they recommend?<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Generate a list
of questions you should be asking yourself as you plan your group projects.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
59: In discussing
the question of whether you need to learn to code, they make a comparison to
reading Dante’s <i>Inferno</i> in English
translation. Does this comparison work for you? Would you venture to produce
scholarship on Dante if you read it only in English?<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .5in; text-indent: -.5in;">
Why do they so
routinely include the price of software in their discussion?<o:p></o:p></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-21866142137555025102015-02-02T08:24:00.000-08:002015-02-02T08:24:06.606-08:00Week 2<div class="MsoNormal">
This week class is held in the library, where a reference librarian will introduce students to the use of RefWorks. In the second part of class, we will talk more about possible collaborative final projects and then discuss the following assigned readings:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Andrew Abbott, <i>Digital
Paper: A Manual for Research and Writing with Library and Internet Materials</i>
(Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014), chapter 4.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Abbott
advises in this book that it does not need to be read in a linear fashion, so I
have assigned selections from <i>Digital
Paper</i> in both this class and my undergraduate history research methods
class this semester. Part of my goal is to buy myself the time to read it for
my own purposes, for my intuition tells me that this is a really important book
about how to do research—as crucial as Anne Lamott’s <i>Bird by Bird</i> is for writing. I am an admirer of other work by Abbott,
who appears to me to be the smartest contemporary scholar in the world. This
chapter is not precisely about digital history, but it points to issues that graduate
students in general should be thinking about as they approach seminar papers
and their theses. From what I have read so far, I have to agree with <a href="http://savageminds.org/2014/09/22/abbotts-digital-paper-the-best-book-about-research-evar/" target="_blank">this blog post</a>, which calls for pretty much everyone to read it.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Discussion strategy: start with generally what he is telling
us, and then move to what implications it might have for digital history.</li>
<li>What advice does Abbott give about library research? What are
his major points about organizing a research project?</li>
<li>How would you implement the suggestions practically, using
digital tools (acknowledging Abbott’s own preference for paper)?</li>
<li>What is the difference between scanning and browsing?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
T. Mills Kelly, <i><a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/cgi/t/text/text-idx?cc=dh;c=dh;idno=12146032.0001.001;rgn=full%20text;view=toc;xc=1;g=dculture" target="_blank">Teaching History in the Digital Age</a></i>, Preface through chapter 2.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Preface<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What do you think of his point that if students are engaged
with what they are doing, they are probably learning better—even if it’s
technology and not history that focuses them?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Introduction<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Why did Kelly’s student feel free to mash-up a primary
source? In what sense was it “better” than the original? Why would historians
object to this practice?</li>
<li>Where do you stand on the “authenticity” vs. “originality”
dichotomy he sets up?</li>
<li>Do you agree that lecture is the worst possible way to teach
anything?</li>
<li>What does he mean by “remix culture”?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Chapter 1: Thinking<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What distinction does Kelly draw
between considering how best to teach history and how students learn history
best?</li>
<li>What skills, facts, and ideas
about history should we be trying to inculcate in students?</li>
<li>What is Kelly’s attitude toward
students? Is this an attitude many history professors share?</li>
<li>What does he mean by “do history” and
“make history”?</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Chapter 2: Finding<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Kelly opens with discussion of the
difficulty of teaching Eastern European history to American students because of
the language barrier—he was mostly limited to teaching primary sources that
originally in English or were translated into English. Does translation include
barriers that student readers should be aware of? Are those barriers in any way
comparable to those we should consider when consuming primary sources made
available online?</li>
<li>Do students actually wander freely
around the internet, finding all sorts of historical sources without
professorial encouragement?</li>
<li>What is “disintermediation,” which
Kelly defines as “the removal of hierarchical controls over information in the
digital realm”?</li>
<li>Kelly suggests that it is a
mistake to expect 21<sup>st</sup> century students to rely only on sources
vetted by historians. Is it possible to reconcile this stance with Abbott’s
clearly stated belief that not only should we rely on peer reviewed sources,
but we should also depend on a hierarchy of prestige among university presses
and academic journals? Are there other important differences in how Kelly and
Abbott think about (student) research paths that we should be aware of?</li>
<li>What is the problem with the Adolf
Hitler Historical Museum? (Is it still out there? I tried Kelly’s searches and
did not get similar results.)</li>
<li>What “digital literacy” information
skills should we be inculcating in students?</li>
<li>Why does Kelly provide the date of
his Google searches? Should we be worried about the fact that Google searches
are actually <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Personalized_Search" target="_blank">individualized by computer</a>?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Daniel J. Cohen and Roy Rosenzweig, <i>Digital History: A Guide to Gathering, Preserving, and Presenting the
Past on the Web</i> (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006),<a href="http://chnm.gmu.edu/digitalhistory/introduction/" target="_blank">Introduction</a>.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Note the publication date</li>
<li>What are the reasons they are optimistic
about the utility of the web for history? Are there any new reasons for (or
against) that have emerged since they published?</li>
<li>Qualities [capacity,
accessibility, flexibility, diversity, manipulability, interactivity, and
hypertextuality (non-linearity)] and dangers of networks (quality, durability,
readability, passivity, and inaccessibility)</li>
<li>How is authority established on
the web? How do you know what to trust, what to be skeptical of, and how to use
it?</li>
<li>How do you know what order in
which to read hypertext historical materials?</li>
<li>Should we look for argument in
digital historical scholarship? Should we try to embed argument in digital
historical scholarship?</li>
<li>What do you think of the practice
of academic publishers of charging (relatively high) prices for access to their
digital databases of journals? Do you feel the same way about book publishers?</li>
<li>What does “open source” mean?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-25700825414980661572015-01-22T11:09:00.001-08:002015-01-22T11:09:19.197-08:00Syllabus posted!I finally got my syllabus ready for the spring semester. In case you would like to see how I structured the course, you can read it <a href="https://pantherfile.uwm.edu/seligman/public/History%20717%20syllabus%20Spring%202015.pdf" target="_blank">here</a>.<br />
<br />
I did some major restructuring since the first iteration of the class, but I did keep some of the elements that I found most successful.Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-74426272873261057472015-01-15T10:30:00.002-08:002015-01-15T10:30:29.704-08:00Three ReflectionsAs I revise the syllabus, I have three major reflections on the course.<br />
<br />
First, and pleasingly, I feel that the course is much better structured, much more organic (if you will) than the first time I taught it. Despite not having actively prepared to revise the course through structured reading, I am organizing the topics better and have much clearer ideas of what to include and include. The syllabus feels much less driven by a few main texts and more more topical.<br />
<br />
Second, and less pleasingly, I feel myself retreating from my earlier "<a href="http://reluctantdigitalhistorian.blogspot.com/2013/05/ceding-control.html" target="_blank">Ceding Control</a>" position. As I prepare the Google Drive document where the students will sign up for presentations, I find myself filling in many of the boxes with suggestions for what someone might want to present in a given week. I have sneakily left most social media off the list of "Big Tools" for students to present, because I felt I had too many somewhat duplicative presentations on that theme last time. Those tactics are the result of knowing better what I am doing and what my goals are, but it might meant that the course caters less to the students' individual interests.<br />
<br />
Third, I am still a Reluctant Digital Historian. I cannot get very excited about learning how to use new tools. I like to know that new tools are out there. For example, despite a failed experiment in using <a href="http://timeline.knightlab.com/" target="_blank">TimelineJS</a> in my spring semester undergraduate capstone course, I have added it to the list of Big Tools that students might want to present on. But I do not have much enthusiasm for spending hours learning how to make a tool work for me, unless I know I am going to use it <i>all the time</i> (like my word processor or email). Like last year, I decided to survey my students about their DH background. Last year, I used <a href="https://www.surveymonkey.com/" target="_blank">Survey Monkey</a>. This year, because I knew that UWM has purchased access to a more sophisticated <a href="https://www4.uwm.edu/survey/index.cfm?a1=qualtrics&notify=TRUE" target="_blank">survey tool</a>, I tried to use it instead. But after ten minutes of noodling around, I decided that it was much more than I needed, and not quite intuitive enough. So I gave up and just duplicated my previous survey.Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-13329373197640272362015-01-15T07:41:00.003-08:002015-01-15T07:41:48.838-08:00HashtagWant to follow this class online? The spring 2015 course hashtag is <span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman', serif; font-size: 12pt;">#HIS717S15.</span>Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-37822567538354156522015-01-09T11:24:00.001-08:002015-01-09T11:24:09.709-08:00History 717, ReduxI'm spending a very cold Milwaukee afternoon in my office, prepping a new iteration of History 717: History and the New Media. It's daunting!Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-45187615653817088592014-05-14T13:55:00.002-07:002014-05-14T13:55:54.114-07:00One final project<br />
Most of the students in History 717 opted for final papers and projects that are not available online. But one intrepid student took the opportunity to learn about Neatline. The upshot is "The Milwaukee Crime Map Project," available here: <a href="http://historicize.us/map/">http://historicize.us/map/</a><br />
<br />
I hope to make one last post, reflecting on what I will do differently when I next teach this course, currently scheduled for Spring 2015.Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-5611190259726301152014-04-29T12:24:00.003-07:002014-04-29T12:24:22.487-07:00Weeks 14 and 15: PresentationsWe are winding up the semester. In our last two class sessions, students will present their papers and projects to the class.Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-21627019786735870412014-04-22T12:51:00.003-07:002014-04-22T12:51:34.441-07:00Week 13<div class="MsoNormal">
Readings from Bill Adair, Benjamin Filene, and Laura
Koloski, <i>Letting Go: Sharing Historical
Authority in a User-Generated World</i> (Philadelphia, PA: Pew Center for Arts
and Heritage, 2011).<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
What we have seen throughout this semester is that historical
knowledge roles that used to be fairly distinct (professor/researcher;
librarian/archivist; museum professional; journal editor) appear to be getting
all mixed up in the 21<sup>st</sup> century in the context of the web. This
week’s readings introduce in an explicit way how the public as consumers can
merge into those roles as well. What are the implications of these developments
for how we should training graduate students (and the public) and for how you
think about your own careers?</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>There is a wealth of opportunities in the digital age to
make history meaningful to a wide variety of audiences. How do you pick your
focus?</li>
<li>You personally, in managing your career and avocation as a historian?</li>
<li>A given museum, library, nonprofit organization, for-profit
business, or other organization that you might work for/with?</li>
</ul>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Introduction<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What are the advantages and disadvantages of publicly
curated museum content? Are there any special considerations for the web that
are different from in physical museums?</li>
<li>Why do they say that public curation demands more work
rather than less from museums? If public content is professionally edited, then
how public is it? What parallels with “reality TV” might reasonably be drawn?</li>
<li>Ask someone with public history background to talk about
Frisch’s idea of “shared authority.”</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Nina Simon, “Participatory Design and the Future of Museums”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>If the web remains an open free-for-all, why shouldn’t
museums continue to carefully select and present objects within an interpretive
framework?</li>
<li>What is a “folksonomy”?</li>
<li>What is the difference between gatekeeping and curation?</li>
<li>Why isn’t soliciting participation enough? Why must one also
use the fruits of that participation?</li>
<li>What is the “proximate model”? What are the shortcomings for
taking such a business concept and applying it to a museum?</li>
<li>The Human Library catalog</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Steve Zeitlin, “Where Are the Best Stories? Where Is My
Story?—Participation and Curation in the New Media Age”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What happens if you invite participation and then don’t post
what people share?</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cityofmemory.org/map/index.php">http://www.cityofmemory.org/map/index.php</a></li>
<li>Do you approve of reviewing and editing public contributions
before posting? Should contributors be consulted about the edited version?</li>
<li>Does the collector have an obligation to store the
originals?</li>
<li>What’s the difference between collecting the best stories
and getting everyone telling stories (Alan Lomax and Pete Seeger story that
ends the essay)? Is there room for both?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Matthew Fisher and Bill Adair, “Online Dialogue and Cultural
Practice: A Conversation”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What are the practical implications of running an exhibition
“that never ends”?</li>
<li>What are the strengths and weakness of relying on the wisdom
of crowds, for example to recommend books through a “favoriting” system?</li>
<li>P. 53: “mini curatorial interventions”: commenting,
blogging, bookmarking, and favoriting</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Matthew MacArthur, “Get Real! The Role of Objects in the
Digital Age”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>You can’t collect and curate everything, even though
everyone might have access. How can we make choices?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-4502631641132739532014-04-15T12:23:00.005-07:002014-04-15T12:23:52.913-07:00Week 12<div class="MsoNormal">
Writing History in the Digital Age<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Fred Gibbs and Trevor Owens, “The Hermeneutics of Data and
Historical Writing”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is the difference between data and evidence?</li>
<li>Why don’t historians talk more about their methodologies?</li>
<li>162: what kind of experience with “negative results” do you
have?</li>
<li>What steps/tools are needed to make data available?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Ansley T. Erickson, “Historical Research and the Problem of
Categories: Reflections on 10,000 Digital Note Cards”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What solutions do you use for notetaking? For organizing
your ideas?</li>
<li>How do purposeful systems affect what you can think about
your topic? How you can find a specific piece of information in your notes?</li>
<li>What role does the writing process itself play in the
organization and clarity of your ideas?</li>
<li>Is a relational database more than just a shortcut to proper
footnotes?</li>
<li>142: what if finding aids were constantly updated? Unit
recently most have not even been collectively searchable?</li>
<li>How have you used keywords and tags in your own research?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Gwendolyn Midlo Hall, “Africa and Africans in the African
Diaspora: The Uses of Relational Databases,” <i>American Historical Review</i> 115 (1) (February 2010): 136-150.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Are you comfortable with the idea of using data that you did
not gather?</li>
<li>Why is ethnicity important to Hall’s critique?</li>
<li>How does data get into a databse? How does one access it?</li>
<li>What is “unquantifiable data”?</li>
<li>What can you tell about the original article without having
been assigned to read it? What does Hall think the problem with it was?</li>
<li><a href="http://www.slavevoyages.org/tast/index.faces">http://www.slavevoyages.org/tast/index.faces</a></li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-62530487470917652592014-04-08T12:42:00.002-07:002014-04-08T12:42:52.209-07:00Week 11: Hacking Scholarship<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p>General questions</o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<ul>
<li>Why do these questions arise in the context of digital history?</li>
<li>Do these calls for change comport nicely with the AHA’s approach to assessing the place of DH?</li>
<li>Is DH really a continuity with the past of the profession, or something new?</li>
<li>What’s wrong with traditional publishing? What’s right about it?</li>
<li>What kind of gatekeeping would you like to have for the stuff you need access to in order to produce your own work?</li>
</ul>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
Alex Galarza, Jason Heppler, and
Douglas Seefeldt, “A Call to Redefine Historical Scholarship in the Digital
Turn,” <i>Journal of Digital Humanities</i>
1 (4) (2012): <a href="http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/a-call-to-redefine-historical-scholarship-in-the-digital-turn/">http://journalofdigitalhumanities.org/1-4/a-call-to-redefine-historical-scholarship-in-the-digital-turn/</a>.<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Are you persuaded that the digital turn in history is a
“revolution”?</li>
<li>We have talked about obstacles to the acceptance of DH
before. What kinds of solutions can you imagine?</li>
<li>Do you accept the suggestion that coding and building
platforms should count as scholarship for historians?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
All of the “Hacking Scholarship”
essays in <i>Hacking the Academy: New
Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities</i>, edited by
Daniel J. Cohen and Tom Scheinfeldt (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan
Press, 2013): <a href="http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12172434.0001.001/1:2/--hacking-the-academy-new-approaches-to-scholarship?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1">http://quod.lib.umich.edu/d/dh/12172434.0001.001/1:2/--hacking-the-academy-new-approaches-to-scholarship?g=dculture;rgn=div1;view=fulltext;xc=1</a><o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Jason Baird Jackson, “Getting Yourself Out of the Business
in Five Easy Steps”</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is the criticism of
for-profit publishers?</li>
<li>If you conduct peer review for
them, are you really working for free? Is this bad?</li>
<li>How do you know if you are working
with a for-profit rather than a non-profit publisher?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
David Parry<i>, </i>“Burn
the Boats/Books”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What’s wrong with the book?</li>
<li>What do you think of the phrase
“the Gutenberg Parenthesis”?</li>
<li>What is “librocentrism”?</li>
<li>How is knowledge a commodity?</li>
<li>What does he mean by “closed system”?</li>
<li>Is a PDF really just a book on the
web?</li>
<li>What would it mean if scholars
were aggregators and curators instead of producers? What would librarians do?</li>
<li>Are books locked behind a paywall?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left: .25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Jo Guldi, “Reinventing the Academic Journal”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What does she mean by “Web 2.0”? We haven’t talked about
this term so far.</li>
<li>What do you think of her recommendations? We will spend all
of our time curating our bibliographies or conducting our research?</li>
<li>Is she proposing that journals give up publishing and
instead become authoritative linkers?</li>
<li>Would people really spend a lot of time commenting on other
people’s unfinished essays? What was your experience with the times we did that
this semester?</li>
<li>Would you indefinitely revise a paper?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Michael O’Malley, “Reading and Writing”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Is it your experience that the word processor has had little
effect on academic writing?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Voices: Blogging<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>How does blogging relate to published writing, in your view?
Have any of your ideas about this changed over the course of the semester?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
John Unsworth, “The Crisis of Audience and the Open-Access
Solution”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Is it true that no one is reading the scholarly books? Do
you write so you can have an audience?</li>
<li>What is open access?</li>
<li>Who is going to keep track of all the new publications
floating around online?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Kathleen Fitzpatrick, “Open-Access Publishing”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What are the costs of publishing?</li>
<li>What is wrong with traditional publishing?</li>
<li>What are the advantages and disadvantages of open-access
publishing?</li>
<li>Is the claim that the public is not interested in
scholarship a straw man or a red herring?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Open Access and Scholarly Values: A Conversation<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>Cohen suggests that failure to publish digitally, for free,
is a contradiction for scholars who “champion…the voices of those who are less
privileged and powerful.” Do you agree?</li>
<li>Is work published in gated journals really invisible?</li>
<li>Do scholars actually read their colleagues’ work?</li>
<li>“Open access—which is an ethically superior form of
dissemination on its face, and a moral obligation for public institutions”: Do
you agree?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Voices: Sharing One’s Research<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Mills Kelly, “Making Digital Scholarship Count”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>To what extent are you as graduate students thinking about the
prestige hierarchy of scholarly publishing?</li>
<li>Definition of scholarship: “<span style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #231f20;">In almost any discipline, scholarship has the following
characteristics: it is the result of original research; it has an argument of
some sort and that argument is situated in a preexisting conversation among
scholars; it is public; it is peer-reviewed; and it has an audience response.</span>”</li>
<li><span style="background-color: white; color: #231f20;">Is argument
essential to counting as scholarship? In Kelly’s </span><i style="color: #231f20;">Teaching History in the Digital Age</i><span style="background-color: white; color: #231f20;">, he suggests that mashups make
arguments.</span></li>
<li><span style="background-color: white; color: #231f20;">Why is he
skeptical of the value of gatekeeping?</span></li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Tom Scheinfeldt, “Theory, Method, and Digital Humanities”<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>“<span style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; color: #231f20;">What
humanities arguments does digital humanities make?</span>”</li>
<li>“I believe we are at a similar moment of change right
now—that we are entering a new phase of scholarship that will be dominated not
by ideas, but once again by organizing activities, both in terms of organizing
knowledge, and organizing ourselves and our work.”</li>
<li>Is it too early for digital humanities to make arguments? Is
that why we have spent much of the semester thinking about websites’ “big ideas”
rather than their arguments?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Notice this document:<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/february-2014/making-something-out-of-bupkis-the-aha%E2%80%99s-ad-hoc-committee-on-professional-evaluation-of-digital-scholarship">https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/february-2014/making-something-out-of-bupkis-the-aha%E2%80%99s-ad-hoc-committee-on-professional-evaluation-of-digital-scholarship</a></li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<br /></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-437006415701261930.post-57751242572579959252014-03-31T10:05:00.000-07:002014-03-31T10:05:16.969-07:00Week 10 Big DataThis week's reading assignment is <i><a href="http://www.themacroscope.org/" target="_blank">The Historian's Macroscrope</a></i>, currently available in draft form on a Word Press platform allowing comments.<br />
<br />
Thus our questions this week involve both what it's like to read a work of scholarship on an unfamiliar idea in draft form and the substance of the work.<br />
<br />
Process questions:<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What do they mean by “live writing”?</li>
<li>What strategy did you use for reading this project?</li>
<li>Would you write in public like this?</li>
<li>What is going on behind their scenes?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
Substance questions:</div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
</div>
<ul>
<li>What is their Big Idea?</li>
<li>Can we imagine together the kinds of questions historians
will want to ask with Big Data?</li>
<li>What do they mean by the “macroscope” metaphor? Why not a
telescope?</li>
<li>Would you feel comfortable working with an “open notebook”?
With live writing?</li>
<li>Do you accept the claim that we (as historians) need to
understand the search algorithm?</li>
<li>What is “big data”? What do you think of their definition?:
“If it’s more data that you could conceivably read yourself in a reasonable
amount of time, or that requires computational intervention to make new sense
of it, it’s big enough!”</li>
<li>Who is the audience for this project?</li>
<li>What can you learn by working with big data that you can’t
without it?</li>
<li>What do you need to learn to do to work with big data?</li>
<li>How is normalization different from tokenization?</li>
<li>What kinds of questions can you imagine yourself asking with
big data?</li>
<li>Why do they argue that Big Data does not herald an
epistemological transformation for historians?</li>
<li>What is topic modelling, and what would you use it for? What
uses could you put Paper Machine to?</li>
<li>What is network analysis and what might you use it for?</li>
</ul>
<o:p></o:p><br />
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p></o:p></div>
<div class="MsoNormal">
<o:p> </o:p><o:p>As a bonus, we might w</o:p><span style="text-indent: -0.25in;">atch this video about a doctoral student’s
project in “distant reading”: </span><a href="http://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1628" style="text-indent: -0.25in;">http://phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1628</a></div>
<div class="MsoListParagraph" style="mso-list: l0 level1 lfo1; text-indent: -.25in;">
<o:p></o:p></div>
Amanda Seligmanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07253524761276709356noreply@blogger.com8