I've been spending time over at Jack Dougherty's Web Writing project, reading about the pedagogical implications of having students write on the web instead of on paper for a professorial audience. Jack's own essay, "Collaborative Writing, Peer Review, and Publishing in the Cloud," put me in mind of some practical things that I would like to do in my seminar.
1. Offer the students a shared, collaborative notetaking space, using Google Docs as the platform. Right from the start of class, students will be given the opportunity to use that space however they see fit to share resources, notes, and ideas. I intend that we have an ongoing conversation about the uses to which they put that space, perhaps prompted by a reading of Jack's essay.
2. Conduct a pre-class survey of what digital tools students have used and have heard of. My guess is that Survey Monkey would be fine for that survey. I'd welcome your suggestions for items that should be on the list. Off the top of my head, I can think of:
Google Docs
Word Press
Twitter
Facebook
N-gram viewer
Storify
Tumblr
Flickr
Instagram
Wordle
Doodle
Survey Monkey
Now that I get going, there are so many possibilities I wonder if I might get carried away trying to write the survey...
Jack's essay also made me wonder whether I should allow students to do a collaborative project for a final paper in the class. I have mixed feelings about this. On the one hand, it's a graduate seminar for programs that lead inexorably to an independent project like a thesis or a dissertation. On the other hand, digital history projects are almost invariably collaborative, so practice in the shared arena is probably good training. If a collaborative project is accompanied by a shared reflection or process paper, that might ease my qualms.
Another thing that the larger collection reminded me of is that I want to encourage students to tweet from (or about) the class. I have a question out on my twitter feed right now considering the appropriate hashtag. I'd welcome suggestions here. But I do have unresolved feelings based on an article I read in the Chronicle of Higher Education several years ago suggesting that it was inappropriate to require students to use platforms that require them to sign a service-agreement contract such as those of Facebook and Twitter. I've never encountered an effective rebuttal to that argument, but moving students onto corporate platforms seems so ubiquitous that perhaps I should not worry about it. Probably my plan to use Google Docs hinges on the same problem, and I've never thought that through.
Finally, I'm grateful to Leigh Wright's terrific "Tweet Me a Story" for explaining what Storify is and elucidating some of the possibilities for using Twitter to teach journalistic (at least) writing.
#UWMDigHist ?
ReplyDeleteRegarding the public platforms of Twitter and Facebook, could you make that part optional? Might hamper grading if you use that in your overall rubric, but it's an idea. I suppose there are possible ramifications if you required it, but I can hardly imagine a problem.
What I worry about is making everything so optional I can't keep track, compare, and give useful feedback.
ReplyDeleteAmanda, I'm thrilled this class is happening!
ReplyDeleteMy suggestion would be to have your students create a free/self-hosted WordPress site and require them to write 2-3 thoughtful comments on two individual student posts every week for each assignment. This would make for an easy digital component to your classroom participation requirement and a consistent space for you to provide useful feedback. Then, monitor activity through the #UWMDigHist (or whatever you decide on) hash-tag on Twitter as you see fit. If people are using the hash-tag, it won't be difficult to keep track of their conversations. I suppose registering for Twitter can be optional, but maybe you strongly suggest they use the service because that is where many of the important digital humanities conversations are taking place. I imagine many students already use Twitter, but perhaps I'm being too optimistic.
I have so many digital tools to add to your list, I don't know where to start, maybe with Omeka, Drupal, and HistoryPin.
Am glad you are using and interacting with Jack's new edited volume. I was going to mention that one and the previous digital book you already contributed to. Are these books also on your radar?
Roy Rosenzweig, Clio Wired. The Future of the Past in the Digital Age, Columbia University Press, 2011
Daniel J. Cohen & Tom Scheinfeldt, eds. Hacking the Academy. New Approaches to Scholarship and Teaching from Digital Humanities, University of Michigan Press, 2013
Best,
Will
Amanda, another useful tool I forgot to include is Zotero: http://www.zotero.org/. Perhaps the smartest thing I ever did in graduate school was download it my first semester at AU.
ReplyDeleteThanks, Will! Zotero is on my list.
ReplyDelete