General questions
- What is Web 2.0?
- What is “Shared Authority”? Where do you come down on question of the role of experts and non-experts in presenting the past?
- Why would a member of the public participate in a shared authority digital project when they could just start their own blog or put up a website?
- What is the role of museum staff in the world of public curation of content?
- Why is it important to this book that the editors see a continuity between participation in the 20th century physical spaces and the 21st century virtual spaces?
- Is “Humans of New York” an example of Letting Go?
Nina Simon, “Participatory Design and the Future of Museums”
- What is a “folksonomy”?
- What kind of participatory techniques have you found engaging on the web?
- Do you agree that feedback has to get used?
- What is the relationship between participatory feedback and the “trending” feature of sites like Facebook and Twitter?
- Do you want to go to museums where visitors create the content? (I did at this one: http://cmany.org/)
- What is the difference between the Unsuggester and spam?
Steve Zeitlin, “Where Are the Best Stories? Where Is My
Story?”
- What is the distinction between contributed stories and curated stories?
- Is Facebook a museum?
- If they are curating the content of cityofmemory.org, in what senses are they “letting go”?
Matthew Fisher and Bill Adair, “Online Dialogue and Cultural Practice: A Conversation”
- What are the underlying reasons for Shared Authority?
- Digital engagement tools: Favoriting, Tagging, Commenting, Blogging
- Is history just “a collection of truths”? What is the role of analysis in public engagement?
Matthew MacArthur, “Get Real! The Role of Objects in the
Digital Age”
- I wonder what the role of 3-D printing might be in the curation of digital objects.
- Do you think that the physical experience or the digital experience of museums is more important?
Kelly, Teaching
History in the Digital Age, chapter 5
- Should historians be responsible for getting digital content online?
- What do you think of representing history with “thought experiments”? What is the goal of teaching history?
- What is “backwards design”?
- What do you think of Kelly’s Lying About the Past experimental course?
- Is it OK to ask students to put false information into Wikipedia? Into the Internet?
- Why does Kelly narrate the hoax in the present tense as if he was going to teach the course again?
- Could Kelly have generated similar enthusiasm among his students if he had found a well-documented but obscure historical figure for them to research and document? That is, what is the role of “hoaxing” in this class?
- What was the educational value in Kelly’s experiment?
- What is the point of teaching students to write papers?
Kelly, Teaching
History in the Digital Age, “Conclusion”
- Do you agree with Kelly’s underlying belief that young people (=students) prefer to represent their learning about history in a variety of non-written formats?
No comments:
Post a Comment